The Print: The document alleged that the proposed regulatory features would amount to “mass surveillance and censorship capabilities”, the scope of which will be determined by the government that happens to be in power.
“We know from history that once in place, there will be an inevitable authoritarian expansion of the kind of content and people these technologies will be expected to surveil,” the statement said.
…“Child safety looks like well-funded education, robust social services, and meaningful guardrails on the very AI technologies and platforms the current government is eagerly courting,” read the document…